ICMB and CEPR group of economists recommendations on USA, Europe and Japan
ICMB and CEPR has published a report Public Debt: Nuts, Bolts and Worries.
The thirteenth
Geneva Report on the World Economy examines the fiscal woes of the US, the EU and Japan. Each faces serious medium term challenges, but they have arisen in different ways and admit of no common solution.
The Report looks at US, Europe and Japan. It begins with a detailed analysis of how each country reached its current position and then looks at the long run, when existing demographic pressures will worsen an already difficult debt situation.
The Report argues that the long run problem arises from the "deficit bias" in democracies. There are always constituencies for higher spending or lower taxes, and those who benefit from spending are not the same as those who pay taxes. Governments need to please voters to be elected and so tend to spend more than they can collect in taxes. Tackling public debt requires adopting institutions and rules that reduce the deficit bias.
Because electoral systems differ in the US, EU and Japan, no single institutional reform will work. As the Report notes, "there is no magic formula for successful fiscal consolidation". But something needs to be done, and the Report points the ways forward:
- In Japan, the level of social benefits paid to older people is far too high. Reducing these benefits is difficult: older people tend to live in rural areas, which are overrepresented in the Diet. Electoral reform is needed.
- In the US, on the other hand, the problem is insufficient tax revenue and an inefficient health system, but the checks and balances built into the US political system have so far made it impossible to agree on adequate measures. A constitutional amendment would work, the Report notes, but would need to allow for countercyclical fiscal policies, effective enforcement and for overrides by a Congressional supermajority.
- In Europe the problem arises from high government expenditure and the moral hazard created by bailouts. The Report argues that each euro area member needs to adopt rules and institutional arrangements appropriate to its own political circumstances. The European Commission should judge whether these national arrangements reduce the deficit bias. Only countries that pass this test would have their debt instruments accepted as collateral by the ECB.
Are the key legislative pillars such as Basel II & III, UCITS IV and Solvency II forcing you to re-examine how you identify, measure and manage risk and capital?
Is the goal of your website to sell services or products, educate, or collect data?