Home | Topics | van Rompuy

Crisis Mis-Management in Brussels! They sure aint doin it by the book!

Printer-friendly versionSend to friendPDF version

 

MARKET (RATIONAL) EXPECTATIONS & (MONETARY) ECONOMIC POLICY IN BRUSSELS

 

Look at the way the Van Rompuy trick (summit delay) has FROZEN news & caused market-neurosis today - directly contradictory to RE / - we have irrational-expectations right now as Europe is waiting for Van Rompuy - have u ever heard the like ? Rational Expectations RE did predict this sort of result indeed warned against it. The European Commission does not understand the 'time value of money' (or RE) thus should have no Economic Governance responsibility; you might imagine Van Rompuy thinx Harry Potter is an Economics textbook. As I said elsewhere & is re-hash relevant; - bungling in Brussels has meaned they have achieved neither potential objective; smash the banking system nor save it! - they (Barroso and VanRompuy) have just bungled the whole way thru;- the issue in european capital markets is sourced in 'market depth' issues of liquidity in all asset classes that has been visible to participants for over a year; liquidity maintenace requires continuos time trading and settlement (even a 5 year old could grasp that) so what do the European Commission do by delaying a key economic decision (set of) Cion has atrophized capital markets in europe & impacted the US and Asia; particularly fixed income products; meanwhile the rest of the world proceeds at the speed of the modern 24hour world of TODAY (not 1950 Van Rompuy!) whilst Europe has 2 sit on its hands waiting for Laurel and Hardy in Brussels 2 get their acts together before the Headmistress arrives! Meanwile the Brussels pair of Spanners are banning trading products and imposing transaction taxes! In a context of low liquidity? Is it ME? Its Absurd! Theatre Of ...! 'The Lunatix are on the Grass'!

 

REFERENCE : the Dysfunctional European Commission Economic Policy development process


& READ (if you like) the asymptotix collection on Crisis Mis-Management in Brussels (below)!

 


Asymptotix diagnosis of the european atrophy problem & proposal of a solution

| Asymptotix basically because bureaucrats can't hack it!

http://www.asymptotix.eu/news/asymptotix-diagnosis-european-problem-proposal-solution

 

Comments

EuroLand: The End of engagement with the Project

 

 

 

 

B AND R GO

- EU Summit Interim Conclusions 23rd October

 

Sarko shouted at Cameron, Merkel and Sarko shouted at Berlusconi! Its the end of the Line for commitment to the European project, ironically when adherence to it is at its most politico-economically necessary; there is no vitriol like an adherent shunned and turned, Van Rompuy and Barrosso should be identified as the first movers of the end of the project (in its current form) & ironically its Cameron who has the blueprint but as the Brits well know - its not about them.

Cameron .... advised by the mighty FCO (& UK PermRep BXL) - Champions in 'Game Theory' since before it was dreamed up at Yale was briefed that there is now a political process in train around Europe in regard to Brussels which is a consequence of bungling in Brussels, (by 'Laurel and Hardy); which means its all about the politics of treaty change now; that is the new game in euroland with 'objective disengagement' from "the project" (Europe)! Cameron has the blueprint, whether you are 17 or 27 - nations feel the same way; 'disengage, look askance at this sad elderly comedy; that's the new Zeitgeist - the Dutch are my barometer; calling for a "Begroten-Commissariat"!

At least the independence of the European Central Bank was maintained - despite Sarko's desperation and greed & complete lack of understanding of the necessity of independence from all fiscal policy and activity of the maintainer of the integrity of the currency (I cant imagine that Banque de France officials, of which Trichet was one once, did not advise Le Petit accordingly).

As the FCO must have advised Cameron; ...... Barroso and Van Rompuy CAUSED the Franco German 'inter-governmentalism' get used to it! Its de-facto now, accepted axiom, first identified by asymptotix! The Swedes and the Poles supported the Brits, noone supported Sarko! The Belgian PM left in disgust, what was to have been an EU17 summit on Wednesday is now one for the 27 (at Cameron's insistence); its all about the politics of treaty change now ..... that is the new game in euroland, again the intellectual leader, the leader with honesty and integrity and vision is the United Kingdom!

Has Van Rompuy destroyed the European Project single-handedly ? or did Barroso help ? Does anyone care now, really? For political scientists, its a serious question (& its not just about the Brits) have Barroso and Van Rompuy screwed the Commission reputation for good!? (they certainly have, amongst the cleverer and more motivated of their own staff)! In any event, with Sarko feeling wounded and hurt, Laurel & Hardy for certain are gonna get their collar felt - HARD! Cameron has London, Sarko and Merkel DO NOT! period! (Stuff the Transaction Tax)! Its disintegration Europe time, the Commission money pit is going to get disengaged from all possible Euro-perspectives for all sorts of motivations; one thing is central, reform of Cion is fundamental; a new kind of democratic model is patently necessary to fill the deficit of Van Rompuy and Barroso 2!

 

The Future of the Eurozone Davos Session / Ollie Rehn (Jester)

 

 

The Future of the Eurozone

Friday 27 January

This session was on the record and open to reporting press.

How will the Eurozone economies emerge from the euro crisis?

Key Points

  • The European Union is on the verge of concluding an important fiscal convergence compact.
  • Greece is nearing a debt-restructuring deal and is unlikely to default.
  • Disagreements remain among EU countries on proposed crisis remedies such as Eurobonds and firewalls to deter panic.
  • Liquidity is not a cure for Europe’s ills; countries will have to address the lack of fiscal discipline and competitiveness deficiencies.

Synopsis

European finance and economics ministers hailed the imminent agreement on closer fiscal convergence in Europe as a major step to restore confidence in their distressed economies. “We need a fiscal compact and we are revamping the economic structure of Europe,” said Olli Rehn, Vice-President, Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Commission, Brussels. “Prevention is the name of the game and we want to prevent fiscal crisis and external imbalances that have happened in the past year with tremendous human cost.” Added Luis de Guindos Jurado, Minister of Economic Affairs and Competitiveness of Spain: “The vital element to restore confidence is the institutional framework we will put in place and the commitment of the countries. We have complete consensus that in the future we are going to avoid the problems that we had in the past.”

The ministers, however, acknowledged that disagreement remains on some of the measures proposed to address the debt crisis. On the issue of Eurobonds, the difficulty is that Europe must first create an appropriate structure for fiscal union, Wolfgang Schäuble, Federal Minister of Finance of Germany, pointed out. Eurobonds are often regarded as something of a “philosopher’s stone” that could solve the crisis, François Baroin, Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry of France, said. Fiscal convergence is necessary first, he agreed.

Also in dispute is the need for firewalls to prevent the spread of panic in the event that the debt crisis spins out of control. Notably, the launch of the European Stability Mechanism has been brought forward by six months to July 2012. Europe will need the support of the United States, the United Kingdom and other countries to boost the resources of the International Monetary Fund, Rehn said. While some in Europe are calling for very “high” firewalls to deter panic, others including Germany have rejected the idea, insisting that the focus should be on addressing the real problems of Europe, including the lack of fiscal discipline and the competitiveness deficiencies in certain economies.

To be sure, some of the distressed European economies are making progress in fiscal consolidation and structural reforms. “We have a wave of reforms going on in Europe,” Rehn asserted. “This is no time for Cassandras but a time to further build confidence.”

The finance and economics ministers were upbeat about the prospects of concluding a debt-restructuring arrangement for Greece. Schäuble told participants that he is “quite optimistic” about a deal and does not expect Greece to default. The outlook is also positive for Spain and Italy, he reckoned. Rehn agreed that an agreement on Greece is “very close”.

Baroin welcomed efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB) to combat the crisis by providing unlimited funds to Eurozone lenders. “The ECB is considered independent,” Baroin stressed. “The unlimited liquidity for banks for three years has significantly reduced tensions in the European banking system and will be an important step to help confidence to return.” Looking ahead, he concluded, “we now have to think together about how we can support growth.” Guindos Jurado agreed: “Liquidity is not the final cure to the problems we have; it is a helping hand but not a final cure. We have to put our houses in order. We have to bring to the fore the agenda of growth and employment.”

Other Key Takeaways

Asked by a Euro-MP about the lack of EU-wide agreement on debt reduction and common deficit targets, Schäuble suggested that she call David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Britain has refused to join the EU fiscal pact, leading some members to draft a separate agreement outside the Union’s framework. “I would like to give you the mobile phone number of David Cameron,” said Schäuble. “It would be much better for everyone outside of Europe to understand if we were to do what we will now have to do in our fiscal compact in the framework of European treaties. But that has to be done by unanimous decision.”

Both Baroin and Schäuble underscored the importance of solidarity between France and Germany in their approach to resolving the debt crisis.

Guindos Jurado told participants that Spain, where unemployment had reached about 23% and youth unemployment is about twice that rate, is taking a “two-pillar” approach to the crisis. It is focusing on banking sector restructuring and the reform of the labour market.

Disclosures

This summary was written by Alejandro Reyes. The views expressed are those of certain participants in the discussion and do not necessarily reflect the views of all participants or of the World Economic Forum.

Copyright 2012 World Economic Forum

This material may be copied, photocopied, duplicated and shared, provided that it is clearly attributed to the World Economic Forum. This material may not be used for commercial purposes.

Keywords: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2012, Davos, Klaus Schwab, great transformations, new models, economics, Europe, growth and employment models, competitiveness

Contributors

François Baroin, Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry of France
Luis de Guindos Jurado, Minister of Economic Affairs and Competitiveness of Spain
Olli Rehn, Vice-President, Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Commission, Brussels
Wolfgang Schäuble, Federal Minister of Finance of Germany

Moderated by

Maria Bartiromo, Anchor, Closing Bell, and Anchor and Managing Editor, Wall Street Journal Report, CNBC, USA

 

The Question I am asking

 

 

 

 

It is well understood in economics that recessions via fiscal drag enlarge the responsibility of state or public sector institutions in the economy, the public sector becomes relatively more significant as a default function of recessions (examples are crowding out) but there are others; in that context then the Laural & Hardy act I describe above, they are the apex of european public sector decision making; are they competent? Should they be removed?

 filo matho

Short URL
Asymptotix on Twitter

Are the key legislative pillars such as Basel II & III, UCITS IV and Solvency II forcing you to re-examine how you identify, measure and manage risk and capital?

Asymptotix work closely with our partners to help clients develop a more proactive, systematic and integrated approach to governance and risk management to deliver proper value.

Asymptotix can offer the support you need to deliver on time. Read more...
 

Is the goal of your website to sell services or products, educate, or collect data?

A positive customer experience is vital to conversion, no matter what your conversion goals may be. Our designers and developers will create a positive experience to maximize your conversions and deliver the optimal return on your investment. We strive to find the perfect balance between the web site’s design and functionality.

Asymptotix implements interactive solutions for European companies. From corporate websites to social communities, our clients will tell you an investment in building a scalable online experience will deliver long-term tangible benefits.

Based in Luxembourg we can help you all over Europe. Our multi-lingual team can work with projects and speak your language! Read more...