Statement by Informal Ecofin on EU-wide stress test
Stress Test: In May 2009, the ECOFIN mandated CEBS to coordinate, in cooperation with the European Commission and the ECB, an EU-wide forward-looking stress test of the banking system, building on common guidelines and scenarios, for a sample of 22 major European cross-border banking groups. The objective of the exercise was to increase the level of aggregate information among policy makers in assessing the resilience of the European financial system.
In Göteborg, Sweden, ECOFIN Ministers and Governors were provided today with a presentation by CEBS of the outcome of the EU-wide stress test on an aggregated basis. Under the baseline scenario, reflecting current macro-economic projections, the banks’ aggregate Tier 1 capital ratios would be well above 9%, compared to the present Basle minimum requirement of 4%.
Ministers and Governors noted that, should economic conditions be more adverse than currently expected, this would have a significant impact on the potential losses for the banks concerned. Under such adverse scenario, the potential credit and trading losses over the years 2009-2010 could amount to almost € 400 bn.
However, the financial position and expected results of banks are sufficient to maintain an adequate level of capital also under such negative circumstances. Notably, the aggregate Tier 1 ratio for the banks in the sample would remain above 8% and no bank would see its Tier 1 ratio falling under 6% as a result of the adverse scenario.
This resilience of the banking system reflects the recent increase in earnings forecasts and, to a large extent, the important support currently provided by the public sector to the banking institutions, notably through capital injections and asset guarantees, which has augmented their capital buffers.
It should be noted that a stress testing exercise provides estimates, based on what-if scenarios and on a number of critical assumptions, which are subject to many sources of uncertainty, regarding in particular the sustainability of current banks’ earnings, as well as macro economic and market trends. Although the sample ensures a significant coverage, the results of the stress test cannot necessarily be extrapolated to the whole EU banking system.
Ministers and Governors welcomed this exercise. They appreciated that under the conditions applied in the exercise large EU banks appear sufficiently capitalised to head off a severe macroeconomic deterioration. They stressed at the same time that banks should continue strengthening their financial position, whilst ensuring a continued availability of credit to the economy. They will continue to closely monitor the situation and intend to react as appropriate, if needed, in a coordinated manner.
National authorities remain responsible for the follow-up to the exercise with respect to the individual banking groups. CEBS was invited to stand ready to regularly report to Ministers on the overall situation in the EU banking sector.
Background
The stress test mainly focused on assessing credit risks (and market risks, through a sensitivity analysis) and was conducted for the period 2009-2010 on a sample of 22 major European cross-border banking groups representing approximately 60% of the total assets of the EU banking sector.
The exercise was conducted on the basis of an adverse scenario, assuming a decrease of GDP in the EU of 5.2% in 2009 and 2.7% in 2010. The scenario was adapted to each participating Member State to ensure, as much as possible, a comparable degree of severity across the board. More details on the scenarios are available on the CEBS website.
The aim of the stress test was to enhance the level of aggregate information among policy makers in assessing the resilience of the European banking system. The objective was not to assess individual banks' recapitalisation needs.
Are the key legislative pillars such as Basel II & III, UCITS IV and Solvency II forcing you to re-examine how you identify, measure and manage risk and capital?
Is the goal of your website to sell services or products, educate, or collect data?